<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Busting some SEO myths</title> <atom:link href="http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=busting-some-seo-myths</link> <description>Tweaking Websites</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Top SEO Myths &#124; SEO Blog</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-28370</link> <dc:creator>Top SEO Myths &#124; SEO Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:30:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-28370</guid> <description>[...] What about nofollow tags? Are they often ignored?Â  Here&#8217;s an interesting SEO post. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What about nofollow tags? Are they often ignored?Â  Here&#8217;s an interesting SEO post. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Beccalori</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-23067</link> <dc:creator>Joe Beccalori</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:45:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-23067</guid> <description>Can you share some more specific details of your study?  Were these tested in isolation?  Were they tested for highly competitive keywords?I don&#039;t doubt it&#039;s true, as Google has always been above-board at separating ranking from sponsored links as inherent in their business model.  Just curious as to how you tested, especially since you soft-reference Mythbusters, one of my favorite shows.Best,
Joe Beccalori
SEO Blog blog.beccalori.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you share some more specific details of your study?  Were these tested in isolation?  Were they tested for highly competitive keywords?</p><p>I don't doubt it's true, as Google has always been above-board at separating ranking from sponsored links as inherent in their business model.  Just curious as to how you tested, especially since you soft-reference Mythbusters, one of my favorite shows.</p><p>Best,<br
/> Joe Beccalori<br
/> SEO Blog blog.beccalori.com</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PocketSEO</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22686</link> <dc:creator>PocketSEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:24:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22686</guid> <description>Sorry, I mean that they do not always obey robots.txt (not rel=nofollow)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I mean that they do not always obey robots.txt (not rel=nofollow)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PocketSEO</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22685</link> <dc:creator>PocketSEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22685</guid> <description>Google definitely does not always obey rel=nofollow.  Lately I&#039;ve had blocked pages indexed and cached from a new site.  The indexed pages had been blocked with robots.txt from the site&#039;s launch.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google definitely does not always obey rel=nofollow.  Lately I've had blocked pages indexed and cached from a new site.  The indexed pages had been blocked with robots.txt from the site's launch.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joost de Valk</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22659</link> <dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:22:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22659</guid> <description>@John: I&#039;m guessing the Google sitemaps you use at /sitemap.xml work as well :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: I'm guessing the Google sitemaps you use at /sitemap.xml work as well :P</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ruud Kok</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22658</link> <dc:creator>Ruud Kok</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22658</guid> <description>@John, fast indexing is really usual for blogs at least. check matt cuts post on his blog: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/minty-fresh-indexing/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John, fast indexing is really usual for blogs at least. check matt cuts post on his blog: <a
href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/minty-fresh-indexing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/minty-fresh-indexing/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Hacking</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22657</link> <dc:creator>John Hacking</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:55:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22657</guid> <description>I&#039;ve seen no. 2 to be true a few times. I&#039;ve also noted that Google will index a blog post on a new blog site within 15 minutes. I suspect the RSS feed goes straight into the database tables.Do a search on &quot;blue nike sneakers&quot;. That term was ranking number 1 within 15 minutes of me posting it on a brand new blog on a brand new domain within 15 minutes. Spooky !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've seen no. 2 to be true a few times. I've also noted that Google will index a blog post on a new blog site within 15 minutes. I suspect the RSS feed goes straight into the database tables.</p><p>Do a search on "blue nike sneakers". That term was ranking number 1 within 15 minutes of me posting it on a brand new blog on a brand new domain within 15 minutes. Spooky !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joost de Valk</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22653</link> <dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22653</guid> <description>@Peter: check it out: http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/matt-cutts-confirms-nofollow-fix.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter: check it out: <a
href="http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/matt-cutts-confirms-nofollow-fix.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/matt-cutts-confirms-nofollow-fix.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter van der Graaf</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22652</link> <dc:creator>Peter van der Graaf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:20:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22652</guid> <description>Ok if you say so! I have no use for it as a SEO tactic, but when I do I&#039;ll retest it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok if you say so! I have no use for it as a SEO tactic, but when I do I'll retest it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joost de Valk</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22651</link> <dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:33:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22651</guid> <description>Ehm Peter: that has recently been fixed, as in 2 weeks ago or so, so I think 4 is actually true now...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehm Peter: that has recently been fixed, as in 2 weeks ago or so, so I think 4 is actually true now...</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter van der Graaf</title><link>http://yoast.com/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22650</link> <dc:creator>Peter van der Graaf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/busting-some-seo-myths/#comment-22650</guid> <description>I&#039;ve seen it on Wiep.net, but I don&#039;t really agree. I&#039;ve seen plenty of proof for number 4. It just isn&#039;t true for every case as for wieps example.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've seen it on Wiep.net, but I don't really agree. I've seen plenty of proof for number 4. It just isn't true for every case as for wieps example.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via netdna.yoast.com

Served from: webserver.yoast.com @ 2010-03-12 06:54:06 -->